Asana vs Teamwork: Which PM Tool Is Right for You in 2026?
Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Full affiliate disclosure.
Asana
Price: $10.99/user/mo
📊 How We Compared
Both platforms were scored on vendor documentation, published pricing, and published product specifications. Every price was verified on vendor pricing pages during August 2026. We do not aggregate third-party review scores; ratings reflect our documented editorial criteria.
Our Rating: 8.2/10
Best For: mid-size to enterprise teams needing structured workflows
Teamwork
Price: $5.99/user/mo
Our Rating: 7.4/10
Best For: client services agencies, freelancers billing by the hour, profitability tracking
Asana and Teamwork are two of the most popular project management tools — but they serve different needs. Asana is built for mid-size to enterprise teams needing structured workflows, while Teamwork is designed for client services agencies, freelancers billing by the hour, profitability tracking. Here is how they compare in the categories that matter most, based on vendor documentation, published specs, and published specifications.
Editor’s take: Teamwork costs roughly half as much per seat and is built for client work: time tracking and billing sit in the product rather than in an integration you have to maintain. Asana rates higher overall, but if you invoice clients for hours, that gap matters far less than the billing features.
Editor's Take
One is built for internal cross-functional coordination; the other carries a client-services heritage with time tracking, billing and client access built in. If you bill for project time, that heritage saves you a separate system. If your projects are internal, the coordination tool is the simpler home for the work.
Asana vs Teamwork: Quick Comparison Table
| Category | Asana | Teamwork | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $10.99/user/mo | $5.99/user/mo | Teamwork |
| Free Tier | Free (up to 10 users, unlimited projects) | Free (up to 5 users, 2 projects) | Tie |
| Our Rating | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | Asana |
| Implementation | 2–4 weeks for full rollout | 1–2 weeks | Tie |
| Best For | mid-size to enterprise teams needing structured workflows | client services agencies, freelancers billing by the hour, profitability tracking | Depends |
Where Asana and Teamwork differ
| Feature | Asana | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt/Timeline | ✅ | ✅ |
| Kanban | ❌ | ❌ |
| Built-in Docs | ❌ | ❌ |
| Time Tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Resource Mgmt | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile App | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Asana vs Teamwork: deep dive
1. Task management
Asana handles tasks through timeline (gantt) view, while Teamwork approaches task management with built-in time tracking and billing. If your team needs structured task hierarchies with subtasks and dependencies, Asana has the edge. For teams that prefer simple, flat task lists, either tool works equally well.
2. Views and visualization
Asana offers Timeline (Gantt) view, Workload management. Teamwork provides Built-in time tracking and billing, Client user permissions. The difference in visualization philosophy matters: some tools emphasize Gantt/timeline views for project planning while others focus on board/Kanban views for day-to-day task management.
3. Automation
Asana includes basic workflow rules, while Teamwork relies more on integrations for automation. Automations can save hours per week on repetitive tasks like assigning work, updating statuses, and sending notifications.
4. Integrations
Asana integrates with 8 core tools including Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive. Teamwork connects to 7 including Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive. Both cover the essentials (Slack, Google Drive), but the depth of each integration varies. If your team relies heavily on a specific tool — like GitHub for developers or Salesforce for sales — check that the integration is deep, not just a Zapier connector.
5. Learning curve
Asana typically takes 2–4 weeks for full rollout to implement fully. Teamwork requires 1–2 weeks. A steeper learning curve is not always bad — it can mean more powerful features once mastered — but factor in the time your team will spend ramping up instead of doing actual work during the transition.
Asana vs Teamwork pricing
Asana: Free (up to 10 users), Starter $10.99/user/mo, Advanced $24.99/user/mo, Enterprise custom, Enterprise+ custom
Pricing note: the figures in the table are the vendors' published list prices as of September 2026 — this page compares Asana and Teamwork. Vendors change pricing without notice, so treat these numbers as a starting point and confirm current pricing with the vendor before you buy.
Teamwork: Free (up to 5 users), Starter $5.99/user/mo, Deliver $9.99/user/mo, Grow $17.99/user/mo
When comparing pricing, consider not just the per-user cost but what is included at each tier. Asana includes timeline (gantt) view, workload management in its base plan, while Teamwork includes built-in time tracking and billing, client user permissions. Factor in what features you actually need before comparing sticker prices.
Asana vs Teamwork: strengths and weaknesses
Asana Strengths
- Flexible hierarchy (portfolio → project → task → subtask)
- Timeline/Gantt view is among the best in the category
- Workload view helps prevent burnout
Asana Weaknesses
- Steep learning curve — plan 2–4 weeks for full onboarding
- Pricing escalates fast: $25/user/mo for Advanced tier
- No native time tracking on Free/Starter plans
Teamwork Strengths
- Built-in time tracking + billing: replace separate tools
- Client user permissions are the best in the category
- Project profitability reports show which work makes money
Teamwork Weaknesses
- UI feels cluttered with many active projects
- Overkill for internal product/dev teams — billing features go unused
- Fewer integrations than Monday or Asana
Who Should Choose Asana?
Pick Asana if you:
- Teams of 15–500+ members
- Organizations with cross-departmental projects
- Teams already using other tools that integrate with Asana
Who Should Choose Teamwork?
Pick Teamwork if you:
- Agencies and consultancies billing by the hour
- Freelancers managing multiple clients
- Teams that need client-facing project views
Our verdict: Asana or Teamwork?
Asana and Teamwork are both solid project management tools, but they serve different needs. Asana is good at mid-size to enterprise teams needing structured workflows, making it ideal for Teams of 15–500+ members. Teamwork is better suited for client services agencies, freelancers billing by the hour, profitability tracking, especially agencies and consultancies billing by the hour.
Our recommendation: If mid-size to enterprise teams needing structured workflows is your primary use case, start with Asana. If client services agencies matters more, Teamwork is your tool. Most teams test both during a free trial before deciding — and you should too.
Is Asana cheaper than Teamwork?
No. Asana starts at $10.99/user/mo while Teamwork starts at $5.99/user/mo. However, consider what each tier includes — a cheaper base price may not include the features you need.
Which is better for remote teams — Asana or Teamwork?
Both support remote work, but they approach it differently. Asana focuses on timeline (gantt) view, while Teamwork emphasizes built-in time tracking and billing. The right choice depends on how your remote team communicates and tracks work.
Can I switch from Asana to Teamwork easily?
Yes, with some planning. Data moves between Asana and Teamwork through CSV or a migration tool. Comment history is what usually gets left behind. Keep both systems live for roughly ten days during verification.
Asana bills for the whole company; Teamwork bills for the delivery team
Asana starts at $10.99/user/mo and Teamwork at $5.99/user/mo on their published pricing, with Teamwork also offering a free tier up to 5 users. That gap looks like the whole story. It is not, because the two tools seat very different populations.
Asana's cost scales with everyone who needs visibility. It is built for company-wide use: goals, portfolios, cross-functional project tracking and status reporting that reaches people who do not manage projects for a living. Every stakeholder who needs to see a project's health is a seat at $10.99/user/mo. Teams that adopt Asana broadly report that the bill grows faster than the engineering or delivery headcount, because visibility has a seat cost. Before signing, count everyone who would need at least read access — that number, not your delivery team's size, is your Asana cost.
Teamwork's cost scales with billable work. Its free tier up to 5 users and its $5.99 Starter tier suit a small delivery team. Its published tiers then run up through Deliver at $9.99/user/mo, Grow at $17.99/user/mo, plus custom Enterprise. Those higher tiers bundle the things a delivery business needs: time tracking, billing, profitability reporting, client access. If your team bills clients for the work, that machinery is the product and the tier ladder is rational. If your projects are internal initiatives with no client attached, you are configuring billing features you will never use.
Consequence: seat count is not comparable across the two. A twenty-person company-wide Asana deployment is roughly twenty seats at $10.99. The same company's delivery team in Teamwork might be eight people at $5.99 on Starter — a smaller bill covering fewer people, because Teamwork was never asked to serve the other twelve. Compare the tools on total cost for the population each one is actually meant to cover, and confirm current figures on the vendors' pricing pages before you sign.
Where each one is the wrong tool
Teamwork is the wrong tool for work with no client. Its model presumes revenue attaches to tracked time against a project. Internal initiatives end up as projects with a placeholder client, and profitability reporting produces numbers nobody trusts. The suite also fragments: meetings, chat, docs and tasks live in places your engineers will not look.
Asana is the wrong tool for a small delivery team on a budget. At $10.99/user/mo the seat cost is real before any value is delivered, and many of Asana's strongest capabilities are portfolio and goal features that a six-person team never opens. You would be paying for reporting infrastructure you will not use.
Both are the wrong tool when the real requirement is issue tracking. Neither replaces an engineering issue tracker, and wiring one into the other creates two sources of truth rather than one.
What to verify before you sign
- How many people need read access, not edit access? For Asana this is the number that decides the bill. Count stakeholders who would check status monthly, not just people who log in daily.
- Does your revenue attach to tracked time? If yes, Teamwork's billing and profitability tiers are the product. If no, you are buying them anyway and Asana's broader coverage is worth more.
- What is the guest and client access policy on each tier? Both vendors meter external access separately from seats. Confirm current figures rather than assuming external users are free.
- What does a full export contain? Ask about attachments, comment history and completed projects specifically. Your exit cost in year two is set by this answer.
If the first two answers are clear, you have your answer. If not, run one real project through each trial before migrating anything, and keep the old workspace read-only for a month rather than cancelling on migration day.
Try Both and Compare
Each tool offers a free trial. The best way to decide is to test both with a real project.
